General DiscussionComment on the Dotabuff above you

Good: win rates on most played heroes

Bad: Rubick being the exception. I don't think I've seen anyone with >50% on Rubick

Good: Diggin' the very high KDA ratios on most of your top heroes

Bad: Not sure how you only have ~51% win-rate with those KDAs.

"Not sure how you only have ~51% win-rate with those KDAs."

Playing far too conservatively. http://dotabuff.com/matches/542722717 [0-0-17] as Tinker. Most of my AM losses were from ages ago when I didn't deviate from the Battle Fury build. My Spectre KDA comes from the time I get a good start. I'm bad at playing from behind with her, I play too safe.

btw comment on the person above and ignore this one.

@Izerea

Good: That 44-3 Riki(http://dotabuff.com/matches/560274771)

Bad: Highest Lasthits only 193, low gpm record, bad winrate with weaver

Good: 52% WR
Bad: Plays annoying heroes

Good: Nice win rate on Nyx.
Bad: Also plays annoying heroes.

Good: Decent win-rates on some influential heroes (TA, Alchy)
Bad: Plays an awful rubick apparently :D

Good: Judging on your most played heroes, you know every role. Rubick player with above 50% winrate on him :D

Bad: KDAs are fairly unimpressive, even on snowballers.

this d00d can't play snipuh
but owns on warlock I guess

Dat game de only pick dat s0rt of made sens3 was Mel's Visage.

Good: Dat luna dat ass, winrate

Bad: I hate Furion, and poor kunkka

Nice K/D/A on all mains and good winrates

Your overall winrate

Good: Your name xD

Bad: Pudge and Invoker :/

Good: I Guess Phantom Winrate
Bad: i have more KDA With invoker than u in 400 matches..

Good: Invoker, loves skillshots

Bad: Morph, and you need to play other heroes :/

Good-DotaRoot
Bad-DotaRoot
Ugly-DotaRoot

Good: wk
Bad: buys midas on everything

Good: last 25 games - 19 wins, Drow stats are nice, although it is Drow haha
Bad: http://dotabuff.com/matches/288750162 and you have some heroes with some inexcusably bad WRs (TA, Weaver, Clock, Riki, AM)

@Darkness - Buy midas when teammates are feeding hard so you can rely on late game potential (which is usually happening when you play with some of your noobie friends). Pick another bad

Good-shadow shaman is my favorite hero
Bad-noob tier heroes played

@Salo

Good: Your top heroes mostly have a nice win rate on them

"Bad" : Time to play some more and give other heroes some love :D <3

Good: Int hero love and good win rate with them
Bad: Pudge losing a lot

@Salo

Good: Good winrates with your top heroes.

Bad: Calls other players noob, or claims that their top heroes are "Bad-noob tier", when you play in the normal bracket on us east yourself.

@ Schnabelfant

Good : Nice Treants
Bad : Winrate on furion/Bh

Good : Inoker main
Bad : Never played Phoenix

Good: High solo winrate
Bad: Inconsistent performance

Good: Obviously good KotL
Bad: Winrate with Invoker / Tinker

Good: CM good winrate and kda
Bad: Hero pool low, shld play more heroes

Good: Nice kda on the top heroes
Bad: seems like you can win lane but can't carry the game alone need to get team involved

Good: Overall winrate is solid
Bad: Losing streak is longer than win streak

Good: valves smurf detection
Bad: smurf

nice kdas and i like heroes you play too.
bad only 700 gpm and longer lose streak than winstreak

Good: invoker and meepo
Bad: you dont know that dotabuff has filters for periods of time. Change the value to all time lol

@Rainbow The Zookeeper- That top lane is mine. Also, I've only played Dota for about 2 months now. Bot games are my friend
@Schnabelfant- Actually, most of my games played are on SE Asia because my noobie friends play there. Also, noobie can be used in a derogatory way or an indication for you to improve. I choose the latter

Darkness
Good- slark and mirana, my two favorite heroes; climbing that mmr
Bad- your hero pool looks limited; if your losses on some of your most played are due to being countered, then work on countering

@ Darkness - Are you calling me a smurf? Here's my history: I played dota 1 some (mostly stuff like wm wars, gem td, element td, etc. Ignored dota 2 when it first came out bc I played HoN since day 1 (acct name is thefascistrabbi or fascistrabbi, can't remember, but it's a legacy account). Eventually switched over bc friends played Dota 2.

good:pudge wr till now is cool
bad:slark is op and ur winrate makes him cry :\

cm.artemis
Good-looks like you have a pretty good pool of heroes to play with
Bad-that slark

Good: Undefeated Wraith King woot!
Bad: Slark kda =/

(I'm working on playing smarter with him. I typically held my own even in our losses, but in several of those we had ppl dying to their carries nonstop. I'm definitely not blameless, but Slark's not a great char when your team is underleveled and their team is 5-man grouping.)

@Darkness lol yeah i watched monthly records only

@Janppa

Good: winrates

Bad: for a smurf Ill say that kdas are kinda low

Good: I love the unconventional top hero selection. Y'know, heroes that you don't see too much of (E.G - Timbersaw, Dark Seer, Undying)

Bad: Highest kills in a match = 14. Not a huge gripe by any means, but seems kind of low for all the games you've played.

Below: Oops, I knew about that but I forgot. My bad. And what makes you think I'm a smurf? D:

Izerea change the filter from this month to all time. His highest kills is 30.

Good: WR
Bad: Doesn't know how to use dotabuff, smurf

Good: Invoker.

Bad: Invoker. Although I like Invoker myself, I can only agree its quite a selfish hero that puts your teammates at the other mid's mercy.

good: plays meepo
bad: winning streak < losing streak

Good Skywrath
Bad Ember

good; dat ursa/treant dafoq
bad: nothing

@drophaR

Good: Invo %
Bad: Bh% ( check my morph ) ahah

Bad : Insta pick invoker

Good : invoker doto best doto