cause radiant is easier to play on
i fucking hate dire, if there were no matchmaking cooldowns i would dodge every dire game
Dire 1,896
57.17%
Radiant 1,591
55.50%
dire ez gam ez life
at 2.5k games my winrate favoured radiant, then i switched over to #1 for nearly every game and won more on dire (dire safe lane yields more farm when you have the mechanical advantage)
same here and something that notice t0o0oo when i lose games with bad team i see that all my team lose there last games 1 before the mach with me ...and they all are under 50% win rate like me ....its like the system form team on statistics and most of the times team 1 is 50%+ win rate team 2 is 50%- win rate.....
Dire 1,924
54.94%
Radiant 1,408
55.54%
seems like i win more in radiant
because when i stack im always in dire therefore i win with stacks but lose more with solos
Dire 381 matches, winrate 47.77%
Radiant 274 matches, winrate 58.03%
I dont know if my luck doesnt exist, but i really more frequently get to PLAY on the dire side, and i really struggle on it.
well the good should beat the evel, eh?
same here, btw. mb volvo didnt rly have to change roshan's location that gave dire side quite a huge advantage.
The laning phase is really advantageous for the radiant... Easier acces to the jungle from the supports, MUCH easier double pull, MUCH easier offlane and relatively easier mid.
My winrates this month
Dire- 50%
Radiant- 72.2%
Overall
Dire- 55.45%
Radiant- 54.17%
Radiant is way easier kek but I guess overall I win more on dire, go figure.
I would like it if they flipped the camera so if you were on dire you would be running up on your screen. That would be a nice feature
Lütfen yorum yapmak için giriş yapınız
56% winrate radiant
49% winrate dire
I don't even notice in game.