I fed that game on purpose because the supports didnt buy wards. If the 50 couriers didnt give that away...........The difference is that I can actually not play like a fucking awful scrub and win when I want to
I told you
'dont be fucking awful'
then you win games
then you happy
then no more rage threads
i think you failed so hard ur lane that u had to feed and make up excuses for the fact u're terrible
U could have bought the courier right ? if i rage everytime we dont have supports or they dont want to do they job i would be mad 24h.
Nice item choises Atum, gonna try this myself sometimes if i'll need a lose streak.
you caught me, us shitty players win games while all the good players are in the 3k MM because of elo hell
I am well aware that I could have gotten a courier BUT i was in a bad mood and did not feel like playing babysitter.
pretty sure i read in a thread your rating is also ~3k sampson
and mine is only below 4k atm cause of losestreak
so yeah...u suck
multiple people in this thread have me on steam, they can confirm for you that I am above 4k
you are below 4k because of a loss streak and you where on a loss streak because you are fucking awful
I dont play 1v1's I play dota.
work your way out of the trenches and you might see me in que
If you want to play against me so badly just stop being awful and you can que into me. It was easy for me and I am "terrible"
Why all this 1v1 shit?
Dota isn't 1v1. Go ahead bro 1v1 and when the cm comes smoked out of the jungle, you get your shit rekt. Wanna do competitive in not a 5v5 format? Go iccup. Do 3v3. Until then, stop bitching about 1v1 because dota isn't 1v1.
^^
if dota isnt 1v1 why the f when you say your teams suck people say if you are good you can solo win ?
srsly the only times i win i am either the semi carry or the carry in solo ranked. and the other people dont suck but are decent(not good they still suck at doing some stuff)
or the times i actually have good players in my team that draft a decent lineup and i take on supporting cause i like shiting on peoples faces as supports
i only 1v1'ed once(with a faggot i mean many more with irl friends) but tbh it some how indicates your personal skill in all mechanics are supirior to your enemy if you win. its not an RNG game
the one time i 1v1ed some fag he was bh on my team and kept bitching while afk farming and got some kills on enemy cm and rubick he was like 18-2-1 at the end when we lost and i was playing some support. he said "u noobs are not in my level. so i added him and he had 3200MMR.... (praise gaben) and i told him to 1v1 me with any hero he likes he chose AM (that was his top hero and i rarely play AM cause i hate afk farming and having 0 impact on the game until mid-late) and i won 3-0 by only playing smarter than him (like tread switching,wasting my mana when i realized he has not leveled ult,etc)
its like im stuck at 4011 forever....
get van-art in your team -> insta win
ps: the 1v1 in dota is retarded. get your facts straight people, winning a 1v1 matchup doesn't mean the opponent is worse than you
^this.
http://dotabuff.com/matches/473118260
http://dotabuff.com/matches/474484559
http://dotabuff.com/matches/472731147
dagon bristle?
shadow amulet slark?
phase boots weaver?
damn, i thought i liked trolling.
1v1s are a legit way to test someone's mechanics..even though i aggree it ignores factors like teamplay, decision making, map awareness etc etc etc.
they are the best way to test 1 individual vs another without bias though.
@atum
There is a lot of bias in 1v1 because someone who is a god tier support or offlaner might not be as good at mid as the meh guy who plays mid every game, but overall the mid player is worse than the god tier support or offlaner.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqgE1dB7P8E <--- better than pics
1 v 1 can be used to judge mechanical skills... but really its not dota, its a completely different kind of game with its own rules, tactics, and strategies. There is some overlap with dota, but really not very much. Begin good at 1 v 1 means you are good at 1 v 1.
I once beat a guy 1 v 1, 9 out of 10 games and I'm still certain he was much more mechanically skilled than I am, but he just didn't understand how to 1 v 1. I lost cs by a lot every game and won anyway. So it's not even a good judge of mechanical skill if both players are not similarly experienced in 1 v 1. It does not even show who is better at solo mid, and certainly not who is better at dota overall.
Lütfen yorum yapmak için giriş yapınız
elo hell.